Add to Technorati Favorites

Sunday, September 30, 2007

New DUI Laws For ‘Party Throwers’-A Discernment

Gathered from the Report by Edward Lawrence from KLAS-TV:
A non-profit group named Stop DUI is reminding the public that on Oct. 1st 2007. , a new law will hold the party thrower responsible anyone hosting a party where a minor under the age of 21 is given alcohol and then drives drunk and injures someone, or destroys something. Now under this new law opens people who host parties can be sued for damages.

What about the people over the age of 21? You know, consumption of those particular alcohol drinks make all people young and old behave like the under-age like the children more or less.

So far as the authorities license those high alcohol content drinks for the public consumption it will continue to cause the DUI and its accidents in all ages of drinkers irrespective of their being young or old!

Before anyone blame it on the party throwers first blame it on the alcohol authorities who license such potentially DUI and its accidents causing alcohol drinks for public consumption.

To know more on this matter read the following most important blog posts among the others in this blog site.
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/why-driving-with-high-bac-is-offence.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

Saturday, September 29, 2007

DUI Father Charged: Endangering his own Children

Charleston Daily Mail news report on September 27, 2007

A Clendenin man is accused of driving under the influence of alcohol with his two children in the vehicle.

Brandon Scott Bishop, 26, of 17 Leatherwood Road, was stopped by a Charleston Police officer on Saturday.
by Patrolman E.J. Tipton and charged with DUI.

Bishop had a blood alcohol level of .197, more than twice the legal limit, and was driving his two children, ages 10 and 4, according to the report.

He is charged with driving under the influence with minors under the age of 16.

Can a DUI father in his “right mind” put the life of his own (or any other) minor children at the risk of fatal DUI accident?

Can anyone in their right mind accuse the drunk father doing it intentionally?

I call upon the alcohol authorities first of all not to permit or license those high-alcohol content drinks for public consumption in the name of Standard Alcohol Drinks. All of which known to potentially cause alcohol(ism) problems including the drunk driving most importantly its tragic Accidents.

It is what I mainly point out as the vulnerability or gullibility of people to those high-alcohol content drinks. The consumption of which inadvertently makes them to slips and fall into such an intoxicated, drunk, impaired state than they really have intended! Especially when they were in such a need to drive inorder to reach their destination with their children. Please prevent people gettin that much of drunk or intoxicated in the first place.


To know more on this matter read the following most important blog posts among the others in this blog site.
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

Friday, September 28, 2007

24 Year Old Gets 30 Years Prison In Tragic DUI Accident

The Ledger.com news repots Published September 27, 2007.

BARTOW - Despite pleas for mercy from family and friends, Polk County Circuit Judge J. Dale Durrance sentenced 24-year-old Daniel Norris of Frostprooof to 30 years in prison for a Nov. 6, 2004 fatal accident which took the lives of two of his friends, Tearful family members and a roomful of supporters, including retired Polk County Emergency Medical Services director Raymond Chatlos and Frostproof interim city manager T. R. Croley, spoke on Norris' behalf.

Norris was found guilty of two counts of vehicular homicide and two counts of DUI manslaughter, although during his trial, his attorney John Liguori contended that Norris was not driving the pickup. Norris and Mitchell Venable, 20, and Ricky Russ, 21, were all ejected from the truck. Venable and Russ died at the scene, and Norris was hospitalized in critical condition. Norris' blood alcohol was 0.115, above the legal limit of 0.08.

I ask Daniel Norris his family, friends and supporters look at it through this “Drunk Driving Cause” perspective. It is primarily not his fault. So stand up and fight. He has nothing to loose but his DUI Shekels.

Did the Judge know it is primarily because of drinking those high alcohol content drinks called “Standard Alcohol Drinks”, which made Norris blood alcohol count to shoot up to 0.115 ! All of which have been licensed by the alcohol authorities but they go unpunished in this entire drunk driving accident matter?

Read the following most important blog posts among the others in this blog site.
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

Why Driving With High BAC Is Offence - While Licensing of High-Alcohol Drinks Not?

We All know that driving having the Blood Alcohol Count (BAC) over a given (0.08) level is considered as drunk driving, DUI or DWI offence whether it had caused accidents or not!

It is solidly based on the alcohol epidemiological research surveys, which clearly points out that people having the BAC above the given levels and driving significantly increase their risk of getting into the accidents endangering their and the others life.-- the higher the drivers BAC the more the risk. It becomes highest when the BAC reaches around and above the 0.2 levels!

On the other hand the epidemiological survey also points out that the risk of the accident having the BAC levels below the given .08 level significantly less therefore it cannot be considered as an offence.

However when it comes to the alcohol drinks the authorities who license those alcohol drinks for the public consumption seem to operate strangely under a very different notion! It is mainly due to their institutional preposterous stand or position that basically asserts that all alcohol drinks irrespective of the alcohol content (percentage) in them high or low some how equally cause alcohol(ism) problems including the drunk driving and its accidents!

However truth of this matter is same as it has found in the drunk driving BAC surveys --also in the field of alcohol drinks ; ‘all the alcohol epidemiological research surveys basically points out that almost all those drunk driving incidents and most importantly those high BAC driving accidents mainly happens as a result of people consuming those HIGH ALCOHOL CONTENT beverages (that includes the standard “beer” having around 5% alcohol). Nevertheless all of which have been licensed by the authorities in the named of “Standard alcohol Drinks” (SADs*).

On the other hand same like in the BAC driving cases, there are no fundamental alcohol research survey evidences or statistics that fundamentally suggests that the consumption of Low Alcohol Drinks (LADs) having alcohol around 2% or less, results or causes any of these drunk driving offences specially its high BAC driving accidents!

However the alcohol authorities who license these alcohol drinks to public consumption seems to argue that the overwhelming majority of people who consume this high alcohol content SADs drinks, do not fall into such alcohol(ism) problem most importantly the drunk driving and its accidents. Therefore they do no wrong or offence by their licensing of the so called high alcohol drink.

Now in the court let the person charged with drunken driving stand up (or the defending lawyer) and argue that he has been driving having around that much amount of alcohol so many times so far causing no such driving accidents. It is only a small minority having above that BAC cause accidents but the majority not. Therefore it should not be made as an offence. It is only when people cause accident should be considered as a serious offence irrespective of the Alcohol Counts in their blood high or low!

Without any further deliberations let me conclude this by asking the same top question once again: Why the peoples driving With High-BAC is an Offence -- While the authorities Licensing of the high-alcohol drinks is not? -- As both of them equally as well cause driving accidents. And the latter causes far worse alcohol(ism) problems.

Related main blog posts
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html


Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell.

Labels:

Karl Solid Faces Six Years Prison For Drunk Driving

September 27, 2007. The Associated press news.

Under the new law that makes the fifth DUI conviction in ten years a felony.

44-year-old Karl Solid is convicted in King County Superior Court he faces six years in prison.

Prosecutors say he has eight drunken-driving related convictions going back to 1991. When he was arrested again Saturday night he had a blood alcohol level of .28.

Solid is jailed on $250,000 bail, awaiting arraignment on October third.


Read my next blog post titled “Why Driving With High BAC Is Offence – While Licensing of High-Alcohol Drinks Not?”
Before which read my following important blog posts:



http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/paris-hilton-drunk-driving-have.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Vivica Pleads Not Guilty To DUI Charges


Actress Vivica A. Fox has pleaded not guilty to the drunk driving, DUI, DWI charges on Thursday in a California court.

If you look at it from my “Drunk Driving Causes” perspective she could be basically right!

She was arrested March 20 by the California Highway Patrol, suspicion of driving under the influence

If convicted, Fox could spend up to six months in jail and pay a $1,000 fine.

Anyone interested, read my following important blog posts:



http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/paris-hilton-drunk-driving-have.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

Ex-Mary Washington President Guilty of Second DUI



Associated Press: Friday, September 21, 2007;
FAIRFAX, Va. (AP) -- Former University of Mary Washington president William J. Frawley 54, was convicted today on another drunken-driving charge -- this time in Fairfax County.

A Fairfax County judge suspended a 30-day jail sentence, fined him $300 and suspended Frawley's license for a year -- all on condition that Frawley remain on good behavior for a year. The judge also sentenced Frawley to substance-abuse counseling.

I see it as such a tragedy that this Drunk Driving conviction to happen to a 54 year old man! Together with the court sentencing it made him to loose this most important job at this age among other thing and the DWI stigma on his entire life.

But what makes me to feel extremely sorry for him is the way that he takes the entire blame of his drunk driving on himself, pleads guilty and like everybody else and become the latest gullible victim of the alcohol industry and the authorities fraudulent deed or the misconduct!

I suggest William Frawley to visit most importantly my following web pages (and the other posts as well)so he might get some basic about the causes of drunk driving, which are hidden from the public view. Hope it would provide him and his families a deep inside into this matter so help to fight it out.


http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell.

Labels:

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Kiefer Sutherland DUI: His Fault Or Not!


Kiefer Sutherland 40, arrested mainly on drunk driving, DUI charges -- on early Tuesday, September 25, 2007.

Here I have basically a different point of view from the conventional one - on this entire drunk driving issue.

In a inteview last year Sutherland told Rolling Stone magazine that he struggled with alcohol, and had previously been arrested for driving under the influence.

“It’s been the biggest problem for me. I have a few drinks and I'm not so worried about tomorrow and not thinking about yesterday. I am in this moment and I don't give a s*** about anything else. It's right out of the textbook on problem drinkers,” he said.

It is what I mainly point out as the vulnerability or gullibility of people to those high alcohol content drinks. The consuption of which inadvertantly makes them to slips and fall into such a intoxicated, durnk, impaired state than they really have intended! --Especially when they were in such a need to drive inorder to reach their destination.

It my opinion it is the alcohol authorities who licence those potentially dangerous high-alcohol content drinks(that includes the standard “beer” having around 5% alcohol) in the name of Standar Alcohol Drinks (SADs) for the public consumption, primarily responsible for causing all those drunk driving problems in people including in this famous actor.

If the authorities licenced only those safe low-alcohol drinks (around 2% or less alcohol content) for the public consumption, most probably this great actor never would have fallen into this drunk driving incident.

To know more about the alcohol authorities “misconduct” on this subject matter visit most importantly my following web pages, (and the other posts as well) so he might get some basic facts about the causes of drunk driving, which are hidden from the public view.


http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/paris-hilton-drunk-driving-have.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html


Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

Alcohol Control Chief Faces DUI Charge

Chris Lilly the executive director of the state's Alcoholic Beverage Control booked under a drunken driving charge after he was arrested during a traffic stop.

Police said Lilly smelled of alcohol, lost his balance during a sobriety test and recorded a Breathalyzer reading of 0.181. The legal limit is 0.08.

Lilly posted $1,000 bail early Sunday, and was scheduled to appear in court on Oct. 18, Jessamine County Jailer Cecil Moss said.

Gov. Ernie Fletcher appointed Lilly to the executive director position last year. Before that, Lilly was the commissioner of the state's Department of Public Protection and executive director for the Office Of Charitable Gaming.

It is a irony people make the alcohol control laws themselves inadvertently get caught into it.
I suggest Chris Lilly to visit most importantly my following web pages, (and the other posts as well) so he might get some basic facts about the causes of drunk driving, which are hidden from the public view. -- Hope it would provide him and his families a deep inside into this matter so help to fight it out.

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell.

Labels:

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Hamilton Women Plead Not Guilty of DUI

Gathered from WCPO.COM News Report on 25th Sep. 2007.

On Sept 9th Sarah Welsh from Hamilton drove drunk the wrong way on 1-75, hitting another vehicle head-on.

Jean Marie Smith, of Aurora, Indiana died at the scene.

Gary Henderson, a father of three, suffered critical injuries and is still in the hospital. His family worries that he may lose his leg due to the serious injury and infection.

Welsh, a mother of three and a nurse at Mercy Fairfield Hospital, pleaded not guilty.
The judge set the bond at $200,000.

I suggest Sarah Welsh and to her lawyers or any one interested, to visit most importantly my following web pages so she might get some basic facts about the causes of drunk driving, which are hidden from the public view. It may help her in defense of her not guilty plea.

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell.

Labels:

Monday, September 24, 2007

Drunk Drive DUI DWI: Authorities Misleading

Every drunk drive, DUI, DWI, especially when people get caught into its vicious cycle of devastations and the tragic deaths.—It makes me feel extremely sad, helpless and tormented---due to my knowing about its hidden facts.--- Any one follow me or not but I repeatedly write about it! Trying to uncover those facts --- that I hope will help some-one some-day to stand up snd fight against those alcohol authorities who are primarily responsible for the all those peoples DUI, DWI, specially its tragic accidents, and its fatal consequences.

It all begins with the alcohol authorities misleading or fraudulent position about the alcohol drinks. It basically asserts that ‘all alcohol drinks irrespective of the alcohol content in them high or low somehow equally cause alcohol(ism) problems’.

However all those alcohol epidemiological research surveys fundamentally points out that almost all of those alcohol(ism) problems results from peoples consumption of the high-alcohol drinks named as Standard Alcohol Drinks (SADs) that includes the standard “beer” having around 5% alcohol. On the other hand there are no fundamental evidence that people who take to consume the Low-alcohol (around 2% or less) content Drinks fall into any of this alcohol(ism) problems.

Therefore the alcohol authorities fundamental stand that assert all alcohol drinks causing alcohol(ism) is basically a fraudulent (research falsification misconduct) position. It treacherously allows the potentially dangerous high alcohol content drinks for the public consumption under the title name of Standard Alcohol Drinks that causes almost all those alcohol(ism) especially among those alcohol vulnerable, gullible people.

Finally, it is very important to know that it is the alcohol industry which makes the highest profit out of all this. I have explained it in my previous paper posted in the blog titled: ”Alcohol Prohibition Mission Failure” in the Standard Alcohol Drinks Blog post series and various other blog post that focus on this entire matter some of its webpage links given below.

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

Kirsten Storms DUI: It Is Not Her Fault

E-online news report on Wed, 19 Sep 2007 by Josh Grossberg

Kirsten Storms 23,The General Hospital star was officially charged Tuesday with two counts of misdemeanor drunken driving resulting from her Sept. 7 arrest on a Los Angeles freeway, L.A. City Attorney's Office

She was behind the wheel of a blue Mercedes-Benz CLK500 on the San Fernando Valley's 101 highway at about 3 a.m. The officers stoped her and subsequently found the actress' blood-alcohol level at 0.13, well above the state's 0.08 legal limit.


You Really Have A Justification



To have an justification of her drunk driving, first of all Kirsten Storms should know that the drunk driving epidemiological research survey statistics reveals that almost all those drunk driving incidents and most importantly its accidents happens as a result of people who were consuming the HIGH ALCOHOL CONTENT beverages (that includes the standard “beer” having around 5% alcohol- that probably she was drinking) all of which has been licensed by the authorities in the named of “Standard alcohol Drinks” (SADs*). On the other hand there are no fundamental research evidences or statistics that fundamentally suggests that the consumption of LOW Alcohol Drinks (LADs) having alcohol around 2% or less results or causes in any of these drunk driving offences specially its accidents!

On this basis now Kirsten Storms can argue that it is primarily due to this irresponsibility or misconduct of the authorities licensing such extremely dangerous or “unsafe” SADs for the public consumption that caused her and all the others drunk driving. If the authorities licensed only those safe low alcohol content beverages for the public consumption such a drunk driving incident of her would not have happened!

The authorities may argue; if you consider that SADs contain high alcohol thus dangerous or unsafe for you then why did you choose to drink it? It is your own CHOICE! No one forced you to drink it or prevented you from opting for the LADs if you presume they are safe!

It may seem the authorities giving a fitting answer. However if one looks little deeper into this matter they can find the insensitiveness, irresponsibility or misconduct of the authorities on this issue. I have explained this matter in my document “Alcohol Drinking: Is It A Matter of Choice?” also in many of my other blog post the weblink of some of them given at the end of this post.

Now let me show why it is not that possible for Kirsten Storms to make a choice of drinking the LADs in this social situation specially given her celebrity stature! Because most importantly the celebrities have to face more public pressure, impressions, compulsions. Kirsten Storms is a super model and she should carry this image! She should remain above the ordinary people in all her preferences house, cars, dresses, sex, fancies, food drink and the pleasures whatever! She can not prefer some thing which is considered not powerful or bold enough that would weaken her famous public image!

Therefore she simply can not prefer those cheap, low alcohol drinks, which are consider to be having low pleasures points even if she had known it is considerably safe having a very low risk and considerably very safe, while people all around her enjoying their high pleasure, high risk high alcohol content drinks. It will make her inferior, a failure or looser in her carrier that she cannot afford!

However the situation would have been different if the authorities only licensed the considerably safe low alcohol drink for the public consumption. Then she would have not had any such compulsions to choose those high alcohol content drinks when they are not at all made available. Not to mention those millions people who also would not had such a drunk driving incidents and most importantly its tragic accidents! So the drinkers drunk driving is primarily authorities fault!

However Kirsten Storms may never will know this truth!

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Father Drunk Driving and Daughter get Killed



Wales.co.uk Sep. 17, 2007 News: Darryl Shaw, 42, of Borth, Aberystwyth, west Wales, was jailed on 17th Sep. 2007 for two years for causing death of his 10 years old daughter Georgina in a drink-drive tragedy.

Michelle Elmore, 30, his partner and the girl’s mother equally drunk also sentenced to 12 monts prison suspendend for 18 months during which she will be under supervision

Tragedy struck when a drunken Shaw sped off home in his Peugeot 405 last November with Elmore by his side and Georgina in the back, Swansea Crown Court heard today.

Within minutes the car careered off the B4353 at Borth, hitting two parked cars and demolishing a telegraph pole and a lamppost.

Shaw sustained a minor back injury, Elmore was unharmed, but Georgina received serious head injuries, which later proved fatal.

The couple had moved from Warwickshire in February 2006 to start a new life in west Wales. The couple had run a cafe together in Borth which had proved unsuccessful.

Elaine Nixon, for Elmore described her as “crying a lot and thinking about her daughter. She is in a very low mood and she cannot face the world.

“A result of the stress of losing her own daughter is that she rarely leaves home. That is in the day.

“At night she dreams about it. She blames herself for what happened that night and she will have to deal with that for the rest of her life.”

Passing sentence judge Morton said: “You both will have to live with what you have done for the rest of your lives.”

It is the Authorities who are Responsible

Every time when I read about the drunken driving tragic accident especially when people maimed, killed makes me extremely hurt --- due to my knowing about its hidden facts that I mention below.

Most of these fatalities involves the drunk driver having more than twice or thrice BAC level over the safe limit for driving.

It mainly happens because of the drinks having the high alcohol content which the authorities call as the Standard Alcohol Drinks (SADs) and license it for the public consumption.

It potentially cause all these excessive alcohol consumption, intoxication or the drunkenness, which lead into various alcohol(ism) problems!

Many people after getting drunk drive in a need to reach destination and tragically fall into its fatal accidents which fatally maims kills people.

It is the alcohol authorities who license these extremely dangerous high alcohols content drinks (SADs) for the people’s consumption are primarily responsible for the drunk driving especially for its tragic accidents, fatal maiming and the killings.


Read my earlier blog post Titled: Drunk Driving: Facts Hidden From View.

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Drunk Driving Deaths: Facts Hidden From View

The tragic accidents fatal deaths of drunk driving many (if not most) times its victims turns out to be--if not the drunk drivers themselves-- then they are co-passengers, traveling in that fateful vehicle. They are closely related to the drivers, sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, close relatives, friends, and colleges -- rather than someone out side this circle the public!

Whatever may be the case whoever may be the victims, the drunk drivers are instantly described as the killers! Killers of their own daughters, sons, close relates friend colleagues-- monster killers of the public in the media.

The drunk drivers never would do or did such a thing intentionally. They had never thought human life would be lost as the direct result of their drunk driving even in their remotest dreams. Many of them would have preferred themselves to be dead instead of others becoming victims in this accident.

Of course this after remorse may sound meaningless to the dead victims, to their families. The drunk drivers treated as not trustworthy! Whatever may be the case, nevertheless the total blame of the drunk driving accidents its deaths put upon the drunk drivers --The Anti drunk drive campaigner, prosecutors argue it is entirely the drunk drivers fault he/she did it intentionally! Having the full knowledge that the drunk driving is extremely dangerous that it kills people!

However nobody seems to care what makes people that much drunk in the first place! The real culprits of the drunk driving are actually those alcohol drinks! Of course after much coxing the authorities may agree that all those alcohol drinks play a role in causing these alcohol(ism) drunk driving problems. Nevertheless they are not ready to put any of the blame on it because according to them alcohol is a product of nature, which is not its fault! Neither of those manufacturers who produce and market it or of those alcohol authorities who ultimately license it for the public consumption!

The authorities further contend that the alcohol drinks only for those who are able to use them safely! The seriously warn people that it is not meant for those alcohol vulnerable people -- they should not drink it at all There exists no alcohol drinks which is considered to be safe for them! Therefore if such people take to the drink and fall into those alcohol(ism) problems then it is their own fault and they should face all its consequences! This basically shows the authorities utter disregarded, negligence or the failure to maintain the safety of the vulnerable drinkers and to safeguard the public interest. Let me show it in the following example.

There was a recent incident of Chinese dolls that is been in the market for quite some time for the children’s play! They are coated with the paint, which contains extremely high levels of lead much above than the amount considered to be safe. If any children put this toys in their mouth, it will be fatal to their health. --Now that toy makers argued that it is only for those children above the age, mature enough who usually don’t put it into their mouth on the other hand it should not be given to those vulnerable small children. Now you know what happened next and hope I need not go further into that entire story.

Similar to those toy makers the alcohol manufacturers together with the alcohol authorities argue that the alcohol vulnerable immature people should not consume those alcohol drinks at all. If ever they use or misuse it (and act like those small children!) and endanger others life then they should be severely punished to make an example that would act like a deterrent to other as a preventative measures! The alcohol drinker may not be the children but the alcohol makes people to behave like small children more or less you know!

The crux of the matter is; all these alcohol(ism) problems including the drunk driving primarily happens because of a ongoing “Alcohol Research Misconduct”, which in turn allow all those alcohol authorities to license those high alcohol content drinks in the name of Standard Alcohol Drinks.-- I have explained about it in details in so many of my blog post papers in the fast. Now at the end of this post I am giving some of its most important webpage links.

I totally agree that drunk driving and its accidents causes tragic deaths and devastations on hundred of people life. I feel extremely sorry for those innocent victims and their families. However they mostly may not agree with my position on this mater and not ready to give up their official authorities position that entirely puts the drunk driving blame on the drivers.

Anyhow I contend that drunk drivers are the most misunderstood tragic victims of the drunk driving who suffers the most and battered from all directions. First they become the offenders as well as the victims of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) thereafter the authorities subject them to their falsified Drunk Driving Indoctrination and keep them brainwashed bundled into its shackles.

Hereby I call upon all those misunderstood, misinformed and tormented drunk drivers to come out of the authorities Influence of the falsified drunk driving indoctrination and to fight back. You have nothing to loose but your SHACKLES!


http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

Friday, September 21, 2007

Why Unnecessarily Take Drunk Drivers Risk?

Most Drinkers Once Drunk Drivers


The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) survey statistics http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/drving.htm points out: “In 2005, nearly 1.4 million drivers were arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol or narcotics (Department of Justice 2005). That’s less than one percent of the 159 million self-reported episodes of alcohol–impaired driving among U.S. adults each year (Quinlan et al. 2005).”

If one compares the above figures to the US population, it generally leads to the conclusion that most of the adult drinkers probably had been driving drunks once or fewer times in their life! But fortunately they never have been caught!

However one cannot deny the possibility that if they would had caught, then they would had become among one of those unfortunates who had been labeled as a drunk driver for life, although they did it only once or twice!

However among those 159 million of these self confessed drunk drivers a most certain fact can be thay all of them been drinking the extremely dangerous high alcohol content beverages spirits, wines, beers named as Standard Alcohol Drinks (SADs, that includes the standard “beer” having around 5% alcohol), which potentially caters to excessive alcohol consumption and makes them quickly intoxicated or drunk. On the other hand there probably not even a single person in there who had been drunk driving over there having consumed the Low (around 2% or less) Alcohol Drinks (LADs).—I make this above contention on the basis of the alcohol epidemiological survey. Ironically however the authorities do not make these facts known to the public.

The fundamental difference between the above mentioned high alcohol content drinks SADs and the LADs is that the former potentially enables its drinkers to excessive alcohol consumption that causes various alcohol(ism) problem most importantly the drunk driving. On the other hand the LADs safely enables people to carry on the moderate alcohol consumption but at the same time making it considerably difficult to more and more, excessive alcohol consumption. Therefore the LADs are ideally suited for the Majority of the drinkers who’s mainly wants moderate alcohol consumption within a given limit but at the same time like to derive the maximum pleasures out the drinking.

Now the question is, why should any one take such a foolish risk of consuming the high alcohol content SADs for their moderate safe alcohol consumption for which they really don’t require it! While the LADs can achieve it most proficiently?

To which some may counter saying; people in general do not face any such alcohol problems as the result of their SADs consumption (which may not be true). They are able to control their drink and seldom get drunk and in that case they never will get into the drunk driving. This scare mongering about the SADs absolutely makes no sense for them.--- OK I say,-- but what about the others consuming the SADs getting drunk and drive to which they or the people close to them or even those whom they don’t know falling victims? Why should they or any one take this unnecessary risk of allowing this potentially dangerous SADs consumption to anyone and become the victims of drunk driving?

Read the following blog post to find some of its answers
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/paris-hilton-drunk-driving-have.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Sean Kanan Drunk Driving: Have A Justification

Plead Not Guilty


Sean Kanan the soap star arrested on August 18th 2007 on DUI charges now appeared on the17th of this month September before Los Angeles courtroom and pleaded not guilty of the DUI charges against him.

I don’t know what is the reason on which the star (his lawyers) defends himself as being not guilty! However here I have a genuine justification for him being not guilty of his drunk driving, accept it or not!

Its main reason is the “misconduct” of the authorities who license such extremely dangerous high alcohol content drinks for the public consumption, which primarily cause drunk driving and all those alcohol problems of the people including Sean Kanan who faces it today burdening his life.

If the authorities had taken the responsibility to license only the safe low alcohol content drinks for the
Public consumption then the star never would had such problems or at least had considerably less problem if any!

Therefore I urge Sean Kanan to put up a fight, you have a justification to do so. Whether they like it or not. You should put the entire blame of his alcohol problems on those authorities. See its more information on:-



http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/paris-hilton-drunk-driving-have.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

REPEAT Drunk Drivers Mostly Alcohol Dependent Alcoholics

About Wayne Johnson and LeRoy E. Sharp And the Others like

Let me take up the story of two repeat drunk drivers who pleaded guilty and sentenced to one to four years of imprisonment. Both convictions came in the month of September 2007.

The first one in Canada. Wayne Johnson has been sentence for one-year jail following his ninth conviction for drunk driving. The12-month conviction far less than the maximum five years – the leniency because Johnson’s last conviction was 15 years ago. Read it in : http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2007/09/14/drunk-driver.html

The second one in the Oswego country where 51 years old LeRoy E. Sharp, pleaded guilty and sentenced for one to four years for drunk driving and its related charges. Read it in: http://blog.syracuse.com/news/2007/09/5th_dwi_conviction_sends_man_t.html

The public opinion everywhere overwhelmingly against such repeats DD offenders. They are considered as the scourge of the society endangering the life of other people. Therefore it has been said that such relatively light sentencing or the punishment is not enough for them they should be incarcerated more.

But the public refuse to see the other side of these alcoholic or dependent men/women who were caught while drunk driving! None of them did commit it by intention! All along their life they tried very hard to quit the drink and even were successful many times! But unfortunately when they see the drinks all around and the people drinking – amidst the human relations raising tensions, frustrations the temptation for the drink, it become too much to resist --- so they start to drink once again, which overwhelms them—they quickly loss control become impaired get drunk and then in need to reach their destination get into this driving and inadvertently become the notorious driving drunks!

The authorities seems to follow a strange logic in this regard! They contend that alcoholism is a disease—Therefore it is basically not the alcoholics fault --so they cannot be fully blamed for it etc & etc. However when it comes to the repeat drunk driver they immediately start blaming it on the They say it is entirely the alcoholics own fault therefore they should be made fully responsible, and should be severely punished. This many times can make those drunk drive offenders feel unjustly targeted victimized, grow bitter frustrated and as a result commit more offence.

People know very well that the best way to prevent all those alcohol(ism) problems including the drunk driving is simply ban those alcohol drinks, which cause such problems in the first place. However the authorities not ready to do so because they know they had failed and would fail implementing this ban. So to hide their own failure they permit those extremely dangerous alcohol drink for the public consumption and put the entire public to its extreme risk. Thereafter they totally blame it on those vulnerable gullible alcoholics who had been drunk driving. They make them the scapegoat of their own failure.

Please don’t misunderstand, I am not a proponent or advocate of total alcohol prohibition. My View point about it given in the blog post in this site under the title, Standard Alcohol Drinks series. “Alcohol Prohibition Mission Failures Reason” ( revised post on August 16th ).

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice.html


Wayne Johnson and LeRoy E. Sharp are now in prison they may probably released after one year. However their punishment will not be over there. People will view them with suspicion. Their employment get restricted. Social security affected. Their driving license remain suspended for long time of course for very good reasons but at the same time it will make them severely handicapped and create more problems in their life.

But I am afraid the most is; so far as the authorities continue to license those extremely dangerous alcohol drink there are chance that they once again fall into the DD perhaps get into a fatal crash and I don’t want to talk about it more! At the end they most probably go to their graves having the notorious stigma of Drunk Driver attacked.

But who knows? Perhaps a day will come when the authorities misconduct of licensing such extremely dangerous alcohol drinks will get fully exposed. So the people will realize their mistake. If it ever happens then I wish it to happen soon during their life time and I will try, put my best effort to make it happen!


Valerian Texeira
Alcoholics Curewell
http://alcoholicscurewell.blogspot.com/

Please Note:- This blog post needs a writing refinement correction this unfortunately I cannot afford in my present given situation. I am quite embarrassed to say this. If I had the privilege of some one helping me in the correction or the refinement of my blog post I would consider it to be great!

Labels:

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Changed Blog Title Retains and Enhances Its Meaning

"Alcohol Research Misconduct: Is the “Drunk Driving Cause”

I am quite happy to see although I changed my blogs title from its original “Alcohol Research Misconduct” now as “Drunk Driving Cause” still its retains its original meaning and fortunately it enhances it!

First of all even after changing the title name from the former to the latter still its web address remains all the same
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/. Now prefixing it to the changed title, it reads like the above given title name; “Alcohol Research Misconduct {is the} Drunk Driving Cause”; if you allow me to add the words “is the” in between.

Valerian Texeira
Alcoholics Curewell

http://alcoholicscurewell.blogspot.com/
http://www.geocities.com/alcoholics_curewell
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/http://www.geocities.com/scientific_misconduct

Labels:

Monday, September 17, 2007

Policewoman Drunk-Driving Given A Suspended Jail Term

It would have been different even if she had met with that crash

Based on the story http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/north_east/6976596.stm Last Update: Monday, 3 September 2007.

Jane Caroline Storey, 39, Cheshire constable for 18 years given four months jail sentence suspended for 12 months and a three-year driving ban. In addition she was ordered to pay £60 and placed under supervision, most probably loose her job.

Police were called to the incident at Kinnerton Lane and found Storey car crashed into a ditch and overturned, she with minor injuries. When breathalysed she had 134 micrograms of alcohol in her breath - above the limit of 35, which is almost four times over the drink-drive limit.

Storey's marriage to another police officer had broken down and they had been through an acrimonious divorce. A mother of two, she was left looking after the family and holding down a demanding job.

That day she was off-duty had been drowning her sorrows when the children had gone for a holiday to their grandparents. She had been to the home of a friend, where two bottles of wine were drunk. She also had a drink earlier that day she told the police.

I really feel sorry for Jane because here I understand that the drunk driving basically not her fault perhaps her breaking relationships was a contributing factor. But it is mainly because what she doesn’t know! The alcohol drink she was consuming especially that wine has a high alcohol contend very dangerous for any one like her to take in such situation! Instead if she had a choice of drinking a wine having around 2% or less alcohol content, the situation would have been quite different to the extent even if she had met with that crash!

This much explanation is definitely not enough to prove why she is not responsible for that drunk driving. To know more read my blog post:
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html
Also other blog post of this month and you will know why.

Valerian Texeira
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

Drunk Driving: Why Not The Gov. Pay

Compansations To the Victims Family

I Commence this “ Open Letter Blog Post Series …..”with my first opening letter offering this tribute to Peter Romano, 44, a construction site supervisor, was run down as he stepped into a Bronx street to wave on a delivery vehicle on july 17, 2004. Its lattest update on Sunday, September 16th 2007 in the website: http://www.nydailynews.com/boroughs/bronx/2007/09/16/2007-09-16_dwi_death_spurs_wife_of_04_victim_to_wri-1.html

There are hundreds of thousand of people who fall victims to the drunk driving, many being tragically killed fatally injured crippled and devastated for life! To all of them I pay my tribute in this first open letter in the name of Peter Romano. My condolences also goes to the victims families the near and dear once for the anguish, suffering and the devastation they had to undergo as the result of all those deadly drunk driving incident.

Now let me come to the main point that I would like to highlight in this issue. One of the main difficulty expressed by the brewing wife Marie Romano had to face is; Peter Romano had no life insurance, which really hurt the family financially. She said;"Every single day is a struggle. I have to call in a lot of favors”.

Now let me straight away come to my main question point. Why don’t the Gov. pay for the poor families of the victims of the drunk driving? Not as a favor but I thinks it is the victims his/her families right to get!

Let me explain why? The Gov. collects huge sums of money daily by the taxing those Standard Alcohol Drinks (SADs), which it licenses for the public consumption. Consuming it most probably made that “man” inadvertantly drunk and drive, which caused that fatal accident and killed Ramano! Now my qestion is; don’t the Gov. have any responsibilty in this regard to pay some reasonable amont to the victims or their families from their alcohol tax revenues?

The Gov. authoriteis try to avoid their responsibility by putting the total blame on the drunk driver. They say; it is totally the responsibility of the alcohol drinkers specially those who after its consumption find or feel a urgent need of driving therefore not to get into its excessive consumption or keep their BAC below the given DWI limit! They proclaim that; “There are no such safe or dangerous alcohol drinks, all alcohol drinks high or low are somehow equally dangerous”! Therefore there is no real basis to withdraw the licence of the those of alcohol drinks pointing out that they contain high alcohol content so dangerous for the public consumption on the other hand to alow only those alcohol drinks pointing out that they contain low alcohol content therefore considerably safe!

However the authorities above statement is totally misleading the public! The fact is that the alcohol epidemiological research survey points out that almost of all those alcohol or the alcoholism problems, which includes the drunk driving happens as the result of consuming the high alcohol content drinks (that includes the standard “beer” having around 5% alcohol), which the authoritis licence for the public consumption in the name of SADs. They are extremely dangerous because they potentially lead its drinkers into excessive alcohol consumption or the drunkenness. Drunk driving is one of its manifestations.

On the other hand there are no fundamental research evidences or statistics that basically points out that the consumption of Low Alcohol Drinks (LADs) having alcohol around 2% or less, results or causes any of these alcohol drunk-driving incidents specially its accidents! Therefore the authorities indeed have the safe options of licensing only the low alcohol drinks for the public consumption and to cancel the licenses of all those extremely dangerous higher alcohol content drinks. This would have mostly prevented the drunk driving accidents and Peter Romano and many like him becoming its victims! Therefore it is the authorities irresponsible or the fraudulent conduct of licensing of those potentially dangerous SADs’ for the public consumption that primarily cause or results in the drunk driving and its deadly accidents. Therefore the Gov. should immediately to pay the compensation money for the dead victims families!

Finally let me ask a basic question. If the authorities claim that majority of the Drinkers consume the alcohol drinks safely, moderately without needing to get into its excessive consumption than what is the need of licensing the high alcohol drinks, which potentially caters to the needs of excessive alcohol consumption of the alcohol vulnerable, gullible people? Why expose all those people to the dangers of the high alcohol drinks while the low alcohol drinks can safely fulfill the purpose of peoples moderate alcohol consumption?

Licensing that high alcohol content SAD’s for public consumption is like providing dangerous toys for the kids for their playing pleasures! Many kid by their nature play with it safely. However some kids for whatever reasons play very dangerously as they not only endanger themselves but also endanger others life even killing them. Peter Romano is one such victim.

Recommended reading
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Valerian Texeira
Alcoholics Curewell
PS. All the blog posts of mine require some editing or corrections unfortunately I cannot afford it in my present situation.

Labels:

Open Letter Blog Post Series Addressing

To All Those Drunk Driving Incident Victims


Hereby I venture into publishing my “Open Letter Blog Post Series” in which I will be addressing all those involved, affected victims who had fallen into drunk driving and most importantly its accidents as many as I can that I read in the news.

I totally agree that drunk driving is the most notorious and despicable among the alcohol problems. It not alone endangers the drunk drivers but most importantly in turn they endanger public life. Without warning they can bring sudden and tragic end or total devastations on thousands of other peoples lives. Most terribly its killing of those hundreds of innocents! As it leave absolutely no second chance compared with other alcoholism problems.

By the way, here I have an alternative perspective to offer that is fundamentally different from the conventional drunk driving viewpoints. In my perspective I basically see that the drunk driver is as well is a tragic victim of the drunk driving incidence primarily caused by the authorities by their irresponsible licensing of the high alcohol content drinks named the Standard Alcohol Drinks, which are extremely dangerous to human consumption as it can potentially lead them into excessive alcohol consumptions and cause almost all those incidents of drunks and most importantly their drunk driving and its accidents! I have explained this matter extensively in my so many posts in this blog.

Valerian Texeira
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

Sunday, September 16, 2007

Drunk Drivers Fight Back

Please Note: When I say “Drunk Driving” (DD) it also includes various Alcohol Use Disorders, Dependence, they are closely related and as a whole called as the Alcoholism Problems.


Challenge The Authorities Into A Discussion


It is possible for any of the person affected or involved in the drunk driving incidents to come out and challenge the authorities on the following objective grounds saying; ‘all the alcohol epidemiological research surveys basically points out that almost all those drunk driving incidents and most importantly its accidents happens as a result of people consuming those HIGH ALCOHOL CONTENT beverages (that includes the standard “beer” having around 5% alcohol) all of which have been licensed by the authorities in the named of “Standard alcohol Drinks” (SADs*). Further more the person can point out that there are no fundamental research evidences or statistics that fundamentally suggests that the consumption of Low Alcohol Drinks (LADs) having alcohol around 2% or less, results or causes any of these drunk driving offences specially its accidents! Therefore it is the authorities irresponsible or the fraudulent conduct of licensing of those potentially dangerous SADs’ for the public consumption that primarily cause, or allow the drunk driving to happen!

Now on their defense the authorities may argue: ‘if the drunk drivers consider that consuming the high alcohol content SADs causing all their DD problems then it is up to them NOT drink the alcohol at all! Or take to the LADs if they consider it is safe! Nevertheless they would say; ‘it is wrong to claim that only the high alcohol content SADs consumption cause DD problems in opposed to the LADs! According to their alcohol research all alcohol drinks cause those alcoholism including the drunk driving problems “irrespective” of their alcohol content HIGH or LOW!

So now the person turn to pose the next sets of four questions to make its points clear! 1). Do the authorities have any evidence of the alcohol drinks called liqueurs or spirits that contains around 40% v/v alcohol cause any DD problems? The authorities answer immediately yes! They can show you hundreds of such evidences even every day. --- So now the second question 2). Do they have any evidence that the “Wines” that contains around 12% alcohol cause any of the DDs? Of course the authorities answer to this also an affirmative yes, they can also show such evidences every day. -- Now the third question, 3). Do they have any evidence to show that the consumption of standard beer that contains around 5% alcohol can result in the DD? The answer is a big YES! In fact the authorities may contend that most of the DD offender seems to been excessively drinking this beer so it must be causing majority of the DD, therefore the beer probably is the most dangerous in this respect. Now so far strangely its collusion seems that the lower the alcohol content in the drink it start to cause more and more alcohol problems including the DD!

So the person ask the most important final fourth “challenging” question to complete this discussion series; 4). Do the authorities have any evidence that the consumption of the alcohol drinks that contains around 2% or less alcohol content (which we consider as LADs) cause these DD? I am sure that the authorities would not have any research evidence to prove it! Most probably they would immediately try to evade this question! It is mainly because they do not have any such fundamental evidence despite their claim that the consumption of low alcohol drinks somehow equally causes alcoholism including the DD problems.

Now to cut short the lengthy explanation about the root cause of all those DD problems, let me straight away point out that it is basically due to a major alcohol research misconduct by the authorities. I have explained it extensively in the paper titled: “Alcohol Research Misconduct” now made available under the same title in this blog
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html including many other papers on this subject matter also made available in there. It is primarily because of the authorities licensing of those high alcohol content drinks in the name of Standard Alcohol Drinks (SADs) which can potential lead the alcohol vulnerable people into excessive alcohol consumption therefore extremely dangerous for the public consumption, causing various alcoholism problems, devastations and the tragic ends! The most notorious and despicable among them is the Drunk Driving. So it is mainly because of the all those alcohol authorities irresponsible or the fraudulent conduct that results in or all these drunk driving problems.

Please Note:-This post is still in its rough draft form! I posted it urgently because I am planning to start a new drunk driving open blog letter series. It is mainly addressing to those involved in the drunk driving incidents its overall victims due to the authorities irresponsible licensing of the SADs! Besides, some time in the coming days I will try to revise and refine and republish this post.


Valerian Texeira
Alcoholics Curewell.

Labels:

Saturday, September 15, 2007

Thanks for the authority

Thanks for the one more authority that has been added to my blog so now it makes a total of four.


Valerian Texeira

Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

Alcohol Drinking: Is It A Matter of Choice?

Please Note: Revised and updated on 15th September 2007.

The alcohol industry and the “alcohol authorities”* make the general public to believe that the alcohol drinkers have been given the “choice” to consume any alcohol drinks made available in the market under their license! But at the same time they seriously warn them not to “misuse” or indulge into excessive alcohol consumption that could lead them into fatal alcohol(ism) problems, which includes drunk driving! It would be their own fault if they fall into it. So if they consume the drink they should do it moderately and keep it under the control or limit. In case if they get into its excessive consumption then they should take its full responsibility and bear all its terrible consequences! They should not blame it on anyone else except on themselves!

* “alcohol authorities”: It involves all those people who are basically involved in the alcohol research, prevention treatment and the policy that finally license the high alcohol content Standard Alcohol Drinks (SADs) for public consumption.

However what the public doesn’t know is that the authorities knowingly or unknowingly hide a critical factor that cause almost all alcoholism problems. It is about the alcohol drinks, all the alcohol research epidemiological surveys in general basically points to the fact that almost all those alcohol(ism) problem including the drunk driving happens to those people as a result of their consuming mainly the HIGH ALCOHOL CONTENT beverages ( that includes the standard “beer” having around 5% alcohol) all of which have been licensed by the authorities in the named of “Standard alcohol Drinks” (SADs*). On the other hand there are no fundamental research evidences or statistics that fundamentally suggests that the consumption of LOW Alcohol Drinks (LADs) having alcohol around 2% or less results or causes any of these alcoholism problems (including the drunk driving ). This clearly shows that the “choice” between the high and low alcohol drinks does indeed can make a fundamental difference and play critical roles in making or breaking the alcoholism problems! However the alcohol authorities due to a ongoing major “Alcohol Research Misconduct”*** still maintain that “all alcohol drinks irrespective of the alcohol content in them HIGH or LOW some how equally and potentially cause alcoholism problems”.

* Standard Alcohol Drinks (SADs):- The most popular among the SADs is the standard beer that contains around 5% alcohol. It contains the lowest alcohol content in the SADs list but its alcohol content still very high that can trecherously lead its drinkers into excessive alcohol consumption. However due to its lowest rank in the SAD list it gives a wrong impression that the standard “beer” contains low alcohol content in the drinking standards. Therefore many vulnerable people due to their voluptuous, excessive or the binge drinking nature opt for drinking this beer under the assumption that the lower alcohol content of this beer would not so much increase their alcohol consumption over the given limit to that excessive amount. But unfortunately they get it totally wrong and misled.

**Low Alchol Drinks (LADs):- We consider the alcohol drinks which contains 2% or less alcohol content (which is roughly around half of the alcohol content of the standard beer) as the low alcohol drinks.

*** Alcohol Research Misconduct: -I have explained this matter extensively and published its many papers. Its principle document entitled “Alcohol Research Misconduct” is the central issue of this blog site http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com . Also the website: http://www.geocities.com/scientific_misconduct mainly remain dedicated to this central issue.

However, after some deep persuasion for a honest debate, some of the authorities finally agree to the fact that what we have uncovered years before on this matter that they admit that they also didn’t find any such research evidence to prove that the low alcohol drinks (that I point out as having around 2% or less alcohol content) causing any such alcoholism problems. However they argue this is not enough reason to withdraw the license or ban the sales of the SADs. They still stick to their old position that says; it is mainly the choice of the alcohol drinkers to select any of the alcohol drinks as they like. At the same time it is also the drinkers own responsibility not to indulge into excessive alcohol consumption whether they consume the SADs or the LADs!

The alcohol authorities who put forward such argument simply seems to forget that alcohol is a statutory drug! If any of it having the drug concentration more than a stipulated safe limit that if proves potentially dangerous to the public consumption then its license immediately revoked or cancelled! It is only in a lower dosages when it is proven safe for people then only it is been allowed for the general public consumption. Every one knows that this substance alcohol in a drink extremely dangerous if in high concentration! Therefore the authoritiesf place strict regulations restrictions over it! The place and times of its sales severely restricted, its consumption not allowed in the public places. Its use banned in all work places, academic institutions, underage people. Drunk driving considered as a serious offence.

Now comes the following question. If the alcohol is considered to be such a dangerous substance then why the alcohol authorities license it for the public consumption? Why not enforce total ban (prohibition) on all alcohol drinks so to eliminate the entire alcoholism problem?

There are two main reasons, which keeps away the authorities from imposing total alcohol prohibition! The first one is; majority of people who consume the alcohol drinks do it safely or moderately without any such alcohol or alcoholism problems. Moreover the “Moderate” alcohol drinking considered beneficial to the health as it said to increase the drinkers longevity according to its health research statistics! The second main reason that is equally important as the first one if not more is; it is a very well established fact that total prohibition or banning of all alcohol drinks gives raise to so many of the underground, illegal, alcohol smuggling trade, bootlegging criminal mafia, corruption etc., which are far worse than not having the alcohol prohibition!

Therefore, authorities license the alcohol drinks and permit its consumption on the ground to prevent the criminalization of the total prohibition and on the other hand to allow the drink for a safe, moderate or healthy alcohol consumption. To ensure this it places heavy supervision, stringent rules and regulations to prevent its misuse or excessive consumption!

So now comes the main question; if the alcohol authorities license the alcohol drinks to fulfill the above mentioned two purpose or goals then what is the necessity for them for licensing the HIGH alcohol content SADs that dangerously expose its drinker especially for those alcohol vulnerable, gullibles to the extreem risk of excessive alcohol consumption, that makes them to get drunk and most dangerouly above all makes them “driving impaired” if a need to drive arise as it mostly happens to be the case! While in fact they (authorities) have these LADs, which can greatly help to keep BAC levels down below a certain safe limit even after consuming a substantial amount of the alcohol drink. Meanwhile it can safely allow the moderate alcohol consumption but at the same time make it considerably difficult to excessive alcohol consumption. Therefore it can safely serve both the intended purpose of Gov. licensing of the alcohol drinks! On the one hand it will allow the moderate alcohol consumption very safely for the public consumption but at the same time it will also prevent most of the criminalization that arise due to the Total alcohol drink Prohibition!

However the authorities still stick to their old position they argue that “we or any one do not force or compel any people to consume the SADs, it is primarily the drinkers choice! It is not right to impose ban or severe restriction on the SADs just because it leads the vulnerable people into excessive alcohol consumption and into the alcoholism problems. The vulnerable people should not drink the alcohol at all if they have any problems with it! Or to drink whatever Low-alcohol drinks if they find it safe at all!

It is mainly to defend or justify their dogmatic position (alcohol research misconduct) that authorities put forward such unscrupulous argument. However it is the alcohol industry that stands to mostly gain from the alcohol authorities decision to license the high alcohol content SADs for the public consumption! Higher the alcohol content in the drink fetch them higher price as it multiplies their profit. SADs also opens up a wider market opportunity to produce hundreds of its varieties at its broader range!

Thereafter to attain their highest profit margin, alcohol industry mainly focus these SADs in their alcohol marketing campaign, media, advertisements, hoardings, banners, sponsorship movies etc., All of them glamorize the SADs. They attribute all the imaginary qualities to it that boost about high powers, super strength that can provide great pleasures and make its drinkers super heroes.

In front of this SADs grandeur the LADs image becomes dwarfed. The SADs make it seem like insignificant, inferior below the alcohol standards. It is mainly for those who can not handle their alcohol drink, for the weak and the frails! The stronger adults do not choose such insignificant LOW alcohol content drinks, which lower their status!

Among its target are those alcohol vulnerable, gullible drinkers who easily fall into such seductive appeal of the SADs enticing bewithments and readily make a choice of drinking it. But unfortunately the high alcohol content in the drink effortlessly carries or flies them into dangerous excessive alcohol consumption that quickly impairs their judgment and perhaps actually makes them feel like super hero who can handle anyone or any thing including their Vehicle. So they get behind the wheels and drive like super heroes. Unfortunately they become the victims of the SADs and were called Drunk Drivers thereafter!

It is quite ironic that the alcohol authorities license theses SADs. Even though they know the alcohol content in them is very high and it potentially cause alcoholism problems. By allowing dangerously high alcohol content in the drinks they abandon the safety regulations involved in the licensing of the drug. They abandon their responsibility of protecting the public health in the name of giving the alcohol drinkers the right or choice consuming high alcohol content drinks! It is no where more true when it comes to going over the BAC limit and becoming drunk drivers, who not only endangers their life but also without warning suddenly bring in total devastations on thousands of other peoples life. Most terrbly its killing of those hundreds of innocents!

Now suddenly the law enforcement authorities wake up and heavily come upon the drunk driver. But it is already too late for the innocent victims! Now the authorities main solution for this is to lock the condemned person (that some times includes the celebrities) behind the bars, make them to undergo the harsh drunk driving punishment also to send them into the “Mandatory Substance Abuse Assessment and Treatment”! All of them being told that it is mainly due to their maladapted behavior. Perhaps it is alcoholic gene present in them that cause its disease! They have no control over their drinking therefore they should completely give up alcohol drinking forever. However the authorities seems to not even aware that the high alcohol content which they license for the public consumption perhaps causing this drunk driving, alcoholism disease mayhem in the first place!

Finally let me conclude. The alcohol authorities due to their alcohol research misconduct (its principle paper http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html ) allow high alcohol content in the drink that dangerously leads the drinker into excessive alcohol consumption and into various alcoholism problems including the drunk driving. Ironically however the authorities put the entire blame on the person who had fallen into these alcoholism problems that includes the drunk driving and totally escape from their primary responsibility in licensing these high alcohol content SADs so causing these alcoholism problems in the first place! Hereby I call up on all the victims of the alcoholism problems most importantly the drunk driving to join in to expose this primary cause of the “Drunk Driving” so to prevent it from happening.

Valerian Texeira
Alcoholics Curewell

http://alcoholicscurewell.blogspot.com/
http://www.geocities.com/alcoholics_curewell
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/h
ttp://www.geocities.com/scientific_misconduct

Please Note: When I say “Drunk Driving” (DD) it also includes various Alcohol Use Disorders, Dependence, they are closely related and as a whole called as the Alcoholism Problems.

Labels: