Terry J. Ash charged with eighth DUI in Vt.

RUTLAND, Vt. (AP) - An upstate New York man with seven drunken-driving convictions since 1988 has been charged with an eighth offense in Vermont.

See the rest of the DUI news report at;

< http://www.wcax.com/Global/story.asp?S=10407746 >

Let me present my “Drunk Driving Root-Cause” view point about it.

Terry J. Ash 43, in a way is right in pleading not guilty of his DUI offence. A man with seven drunken-driving conviction, quite obviously is a alcohol vulnerable and gullible person.

In fact the real culprits behind all Drunk Driving/Accidents are those alcohol drink governing bosses who license and market those extremely dangerous high alcohol content (standard alcohol) drinks, which as the alcohol epidemiological research studies point out, causes almost all of those excessive alcohol consumption, drunkenness or the alcohol(ism) problems that includes the drunk driving and its fatal accidents specially the DUI manslaughters.

To know more on this subject matter read its most important principle documents made available. Its web links in the following:

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2009/01/alcohol-research-misconduct-cause-drunk.html

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2009/01/low-alcohol-drinks-to-prevent-drunk.html

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2009/01/safe-alcohol-drinks-licensing-policy.html

ttp://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2009/01/drunk-drivers-victims-of-alcohol.html

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2009/01/four-main-question-answers-on-drunk.html

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2009/01/why-driving-with-high-bac-is-wrong.html

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2009/01/alcohol-bosses-real-culprits.html

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2009/01/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice.html

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2009/01/why-driving-with-high-bac-is-wrong.html

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2009/01/standard-alcohol-drinks-stipulations.html

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2009/01/alcohol-prohibition-rights-and-wrongs.html

Valerian Texeira.

Drunk Drivers: The Alcohol Vulnerable Gullible Scapegoats

Before anyone accuses the Drunk Drivers, (DUI, DWI) for causing those horrific accidents my basic question to them is; what makes them drunk drivers in the first place? --- Of course no doubt it is due to their consumption of those ALCOHOL DRINKS! ---People obviously know it! --- But blaming it on the alcohol drinks equals to blaming it on the alcohol drink manufactures and the authorities who finally license it for the public consumption! ---However these facts deeply hidden in the background is very difficult for the public to discern and see! --– So it become simple and easy for the authorities to put its entire blame on the alcohol vulnerable gullible DUI scapegoats named as the drunk drivers!

This lets the alcohol industry completely OFF from its HOOK so they continue their business of selling their high profit margins high alcohol content drinks for the public and the Government can collect their share of huge tax revenue by licensing it.--- Of course they all know that it creates horrible alcohol (ism) drunk driving accidents problems.---But who bothers to see it in that way, so far as they have the gullible drunk drivers the scapegoats to blame it on!

Now the most important thing to know in all this is: ---there are NO real evidences, which prove that all alcohol drinks cause drunk driving accidents (as the alcohol authorities make the public to believe!). But at the same time there are overwhelming evidences that prove that the high alcohol content drinks, which the authorities license for the public consumption in the name of Standard Alcohol Drinks causes almost all those DUI accidents.--- For a deeper understanding about the root-cause one needs to know about a major ongoing “Alcohol Research Misconduct” carried out by the alcohol authorities.

On this subject matter read the following most important blog posts among the others in this blog site.
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/why-driving-with-high-bac-is-offence.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/10/alcohol-research-misconduct-cause-drunk.html

Vallab Alcoholics Curewell

Parents Charged for Allowing Teens Drinking Party

A Deerfield father held responsible for his sons drinking party, which ended in a fatal drunk driving, DUI car crash and the deaths of two 18-year-old partygoers,

I found this news in the following web.
http://www.wbbm780.com/Deerfield-Man-Reports-To-Jail-For-Teen-Drinking-Pa/1025630
Here below I give its full news report and my main comment at its end.

Bob Roberts Reporting
DEERFIELD, Ill. (WBBM) -- A Deerfield man will report to the Lake County Jail this week, to begin two weeks of work-release -- because he allowed his son to host a teenaged drinking party that turned deadly.

With homecoming weekends at hand for high schools across the metropolitan area, police, prosecutors and advocates are hoping it serves as a warning.

Jeffrey Hutsell seemed to many, including friends and associates, as one of the least likely people to go to jail.

The 53-year-old Hutsell is an entrepreneur known for his years of charitable giving and community service to his church and community, working with the victims of Hurricane Katrina and on volunteer projects as far away as Guatemala and Africa.

But Lake County (Ill.) State's Attorney Michael Waller said a night of "appallingly bad judgment" last Oct. 13, that ended in the deaths of two 18-year-old partygoers, stained that reputation.

"(Jail) time in this particular case sends a message and it will deter others doing what these defendants did," he said.

Waller said he wants discussion on the issue of teen drinking, even under parental control, and said his own experience shows it is happening.

"I ran into law school classmates of mine," he said. "They were talking about it and how they're going to deal with their kids now. Yes, I think it has had an impact and I think this sentence will have a further impact."

Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) state director Stephen Carr wanted a stiffer sentence, but still said it gives parents more reason to think hard.

"It's a step in the right direction," he said. "We have to protect our children from underage drinking. It begins with the parents, and it begins with watching them in our own homes."

During pre-sentencing motions, Associate Lake County Judge Christopher Stride rejected a defense argument that the state law governing underage drinking has two diametrically opposed clauses, one which forbids underage drinking, even when supervised by parents, and one that permits it.

Stride said a narrow exception that applies to alcohol consumed in conjunction with religious ceremonies, by underage drinkers in the presence of their parents, cannot be used to condone teen drinking parties.

Hutsell and his wife Sara both face 18 months of probation and will do community service with agencies that deal with teen drinking and drug abuse.

It is not likely to be the last court action related to the case. The attorney representing the family of victim Ross Trace indicated that he expects to file a civil damage suit against the Hutsells within the next two weeks.

The Trace family already has settled for $500,000 out-of-court with the family of driver Daniel Bell, who also died.

Trace family attorney Scott Gibson said that his clients do not intend to keep the proceeds from either suit. Instead, he said, they intend to set up a foundation that will work to curb teen drinking and drug abuse.

Blaming the parent for allowing their children’s throwing and attending parties that may some times end up with these teens drinking and drunk driving and its fatal accidents over which the parents have no real control. It only serves to divert the attention from the “root-cause” of drunk driving so let the mayhem continue as it is!

The compensation for the drunk driving deaths should be paid by the Gov. It is they who make huge sums of money by license such a potentially dangerous alcohol drinks for the public consumption. A part of that sum should go to the drunk driving victims.

To know more about this “root-cause” of Drunk Driving, read the following most important blog posts among the others in this blog site.
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/why-driving-with-high-bac-is-offence.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/10/alcohol-research-misconduct-cause-drunk.html


Vallab
Alcoholics Curewell

Blog Title Change To: Drunk Driving: Root-Cause

From 3rd October onwards I further revise this blogs main title name from “Drunk Driving Cause” to the present “Drunk Driving: Root-Cause”.

Thank for all those who visit this site especilly those who credit me with their authority.
Read the following most important blog posts among the others in this blog site.
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/why-driving-with-high-bac-is-offence.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/10/alcohol-research-misconduct-cause-drunk.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Party Thrower FGCU Students Charged in Drunk Driving Students Death

In a tragic drunk driving DUI single car crash, Mary Grace Taaffe, 18, of Tampa, died . She was drunk driving in Estero on Aug. 31 at 3:03 a.m. after leaving a party attended by about 15 underage students, most of whom were drinking. Taaffe had a blood alcohol level of 0.139 percent, according to a report by highway patrol Cpl. George R. Kantor

State Highway Patrol troopers have charged two Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU) students Nicholas Charles Herrig and Kevin Michael Curtin, both 19,with throwing the drinking party in August that allegedly contributed to the DUI death.

Blaming it on those FGCU students as the contributors of Taaffe’s DUI death is the authorities superficial way of putting the blame on any one they can link. It diverts the public attention from its real hidden cause. Hereby I appeal mainly to the victims grieving family friend and supporters including of those FGCU students, not to be carried away by the authorities superficial blame game so not to let the real culprit out that continues to cause almost all those drunk driving, DUI fatal accidents.

The main cause of the drunk driving is the alcohol authorities license those high-alcohol content drinks for the public consumption in the name of “Standard Alcohol Drinks” (SADs). Its drinking makes the alcohol vulnerable, gullible people (includes students)inadvertently to get into such an intoxicated drunken impaired (loss of control) State than they really have intended.

In such situation how can any sensible people ask the drunk person to behave responsibly and not to get into driving when they have to? Perhaps many still can but many others cannot for various reasons.

To know more on this Drunk Driving Cause read the following most important blog posts among the others in this blog site.
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/why-driving-with-high-bac-is-offence.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html


Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Alcohol Research Misconduct: Cause Drunk Driving

Authors Note:- This is the Principle document of this “Drunk Driving Cause” blog site’. It provides an alternative view point or perspective on the issue of Drunk Driving, fundamentally different from the conventional DUI, DWI perspective prevailing today. I regularly update, revise and republish this document in this blog site so not to confine it to the archives.


Alcohol Research Misconduct: Cause Drunk Driving

By: Valerian Texeira.

Introduction: - This is a major “Scientific Misconduct” Allegation Report (SMAR) made in good faith. It is the outcome of my long years of study into the alcohol research that finally uncovered that the worlds leading alcohol(ism) problems preventions treatment research ‘institutions’ most important among them is the US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA); continue to carry on this major and most treacherous scientific/research misconduct. --- It causes various alcohol(ism) problems in our world today including the drunk driving and most importantly its tragic accidents.

Background: - My quest started during the year1999 when I first discovered that by opting to the low-alcohol drinks, successfully removed my fast 15 years of chronic alcohol dependence or the alcoholism. Of course this Low-Alcohol Drinking (LAD) ‘wisdom remedy’ known since ancient times I only ‘re-discovered’ it with some modification and named it as the “Zero Alcohol Drink”(ZAD) method. In the year 2000, I was able to publish its book titled: “A Scientific Method to Minimize Alcohol: THE ZERO ALCOHOL DRINK THEORY”. Its book-review got published in THE NEW INDIAN EXPRESS – Science Express on Tuesday 20th June 2000; and in the UK Journal “Addiction” (April 2001) 96, pp. 657-58. Thereafter its landmark website ‘Alcoholics Curewell’ http://www.geocities.com/alcoholics_curewell was launched in the year 2003.

However the ‘institutions’ dismissed this entire ZAD finding by basically saying that -- there is no such ‘academic’ research evidences to prove it. -- Even after two of my most important papers 1). “The WHO & USDHHS Promoted World Alcoholism Mess” 2). “Zero Alcohol Drink- Alcohol Detoxification Clinical Trial (ZAD-ADCT)” published subsequently in the year 2004 and 2005, did not change their fundamental position on alcoholism prevention treatment.

Institutions fundamental Alcoholism Position: - The Alcoholism prevention treatment research institutions fundamental position, (promulgations) on this matter basically asserts that; ‘alcohol drinks irrespective of the alcohol content in them high or low nevertheless cause alcoholism problems particularly in those vulnerable, “predisposed” people. Therefore, opting for low-alcohol drinking, to prevent or eliminate alcoholism particularly the dependence cannot succeed or such attempts bound to fail (due to the loss or “impaired control” symptom of the alcohol dependence), if the people try it’.

No Research evidence of Low-Alcohol Drinks Causing Alcoholism: - My real breakthrough in this matter (uncovering or this scientific/research misconduct) came in 2006 when I started seriously searching for the institutions academic (empirical, clinical, epidemiological) research reports, evidences that supports their above mentioned fundamental alcoholism position. My search took me to look into those leading Alcoholism, preventions treatment research institutions peer-reviewed Journals reports publications. Thanks for the Internet, the world wide “web”, which made it all possible. My search included the most important “Medline Plus” . “PubMed” <http://etoh.niaaa.nih.gov/Pubmed.htm>. “ETHO” <http://etoh.niaaa.nih.gov/About.htm>. However to my utter shock I found absolutely NO such research evidence that basically suggest that people who opt for the Low-Alcohol Drinks in order to prevent alcoholism problems falling l victims to it! On the contrary there are quite a few research that suggest that opting for the low-alcohol drinks indeed prevent most of the alcohol(ism) problems including the drunk driving and very clearly its accidents!

“Standard Alcohol Drinks” Cause Alcohol(ism) Problems: - The most important thing that I learned from my study in this regard is that all the institutions alcohol(ism) problems prevention treatment research conclusions seems to based on the outcome of consuming the “standard alcohol drinks”. The most popular among them is the “standard beer” drink, which contains around 4.5% alcohol (v/v). Meanwhile, all these “alcohol research” seems to have totally omitted, ignored or neglected to verify or to check it out whether any of the excessive alcohol consumption, drunkenness, drunk driving its accidents etc. alcohol(ism) problems occurs in the people who prefer, choose or opt to drink the low-alcohol drinks, say containing around 2% or less alcohol v/v, (which is only around half of the alcohol content of the standard beer) to prevent alcoholism. All those research strongly suggests that the excessive alcohol consumption, drunkenness, alcohol(ism) problems in people most probably occur from consuming the “standard alcohol drinks”. (Ironically, these are the same drinks, sanctioned by the institutions, in their much publicized “How to cut down, control, limit or moderate alcohol drinking”.) On the other hand NO such research to prove that the alcohol “dependence” (ICD-10, DSM-IV, diagnostic criteria) or the alcohol(ism) problems occur in the people who choose to drink the “low-alcohol drinks” that I have mentioned above.

A Major Scientific/Research Misconduct Allegation Report: - It took me some time to realize that this principle “omission”, negligence or failure to conduct the alcohol research on this most critical of the Alcohol (low) drinks, brings in a basic default or the “FALSIFICATION” into this entire alcoholism prevention, treatment research, which under the principles of “Ethics in Science” is defined as a Scientific or “Research Misconduct” on the part of the institutions. Thereby in a ‘good faith’ I wrote its extensive complaint titled “A Major Scientific Misconduct Allegation Report” (SMAR) containing two parts, explaining in details many of its different aspect, fundamental points, basic facts, of this matter and send it to the Universities/Institutions most importantly to the NIAAA asking them to immediately undertake an inquiry into this SMAR under the US. Policy of Responding to Research Misconduct Allegation PHS CFR Part 93. <>.

NIAAA, Institutions Total Irresponsiveness to My SMAR:- However to my total dismay, majority of those university/institutions members most importantly the NIAAA Director (to whom I send my SMAR and its connected documents) completely ignore it to the extent, don’t bother to send me even an initial acknowledgement response to it! This amounts to a reckless disregard or “violation of due process” by these institutions in such matters. In this regard the PHS scientific/research misconduct policy, including the Whistleblowers Bill or Rights, commands the institutions to send a written notice or acknowledgment in response to a scientific/research misconduct allegation report in the part of its ‘allegation assessment’ regulations.

Health Action: - Meanwhile, a beckon of hope to my SMAR comes from a leading health institution in India <http://www.chai-india.org>, which has shown a healthy interest and tried to help me by publishing it under the title: “A Major Scientific Misconduct Allegation Report”(in two parts) in the November and December (year 2006) issue of their health magazine called the "Health Action" in its ‘Research & Ethics’ section.

Final Appeal: - I am a lay person committed to social justice most of my life, now ended up with this major SMAR, which further escalated by its Whistleblowers complaint. From my disadvantaged position from India, it is most difficult for me to pursue this major public health research misconduct carried out by the leading alcohol research institutions mainly in the US. Ironically the US faces the drunk driving and its accident problems more than anywhere in the world today. So there is a serious need of the concerned people media to take up this major public health issue and to see to it that the concerned authorities undertake “A thorough, competent, objective, and fair response” mandated under the US Policy [PHS CFR Part 93. 300 (b), 304 (b)] of “Responding to Research Misconduct Allegation” for the sake of the worlds public health. Further more details documents most important on this matter available in the website: http://www.geocities.com/scientific_misconduct.

Revised and last updated on: 1st Oct. 2007.

New DUI Laws For ‘Party Throwers’-A Discernment

Gathered from the Report by Edward Lawrence from KLAS-TV:
A non-profit group named Stop DUI is reminding the public that on Oct. 1st 2007. , a new law will hold the party thrower responsible anyone hosting a party where a minor under the age of 21 is given alcohol and then drives drunk and injures someone, or destroys something. Now under this new law opens people who host parties can be sued for damages.

What about the people over the age of 21? You know, consumption of those particular alcohol drinks make all people young and old behave like the under-age like the children more or less.

So far as the authorities license those high alcohol content drinks for the public consumption it will continue to cause the DUI and its accidents in all ages of drinkers irrespective of their being young or old!

Before anyone blame it on the party throwers first blame it on the alcohol authorities who license such potentially DUI and its accidents causing alcohol drinks for public consumption.

To know more on this matter read the following most important blog posts among the others in this blog site.
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/why-driving-with-high-bac-is-offence.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

DUI Father Charged: Endangering his own Children

Charleston Daily Mail news report on September 27, 2007

A Clendenin man is accused of driving under the influence of alcohol with his two children in the vehicle.

Brandon Scott Bishop, 26, of 17 Leatherwood Road, was stopped by a Charleston Police officer on Saturday.
by Patrolman E.J. Tipton and charged with DUI.

Bishop had a blood alcohol level of .197, more than twice the legal limit, and was driving his two children, ages 10 and 4, according to the report.

He is charged with driving under the influence with minors under the age of 16.

Can a DUI father in his “right mind” put the life of his own (or any other) minor children at the risk of fatal DUI accident?

Can anyone in their right mind accuse the drunk father doing it intentionally?

I call upon the alcohol authorities first of all not to permit or license those high-alcohol content drinks for public consumption in the name of Standard Alcohol Drinks. All of which known to potentially cause alcohol(ism) problems including the drunk driving most importantly its tragic Accidents.

It is what I mainly point out as the vulnerability or gullibility of people to those high-alcohol content drinks. The consumption of which inadvertently makes them to slips and fall into such an intoxicated, drunk, impaired state than they really have intended! Especially when they were in such a need to drive inorder to reach their destination with their children. Please prevent people gettin that much of drunk or intoxicated in the first place.


To know more on this matter read the following most important blog posts among the others in this blog site.
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

24 Year Old Gets 30 Years Prison In Tragic DUI Accident

The Ledger.com news repots Published September 27, 2007.

BARTOW - Despite pleas for mercy from family and friends, Polk County Circuit Judge J. Dale Durrance sentenced 24-year-old Daniel Norris of Frostprooof to 30 years in prison for a Nov. 6, 2004 fatal accident which took the lives of two of his friends, Tearful family members and a roomful of supporters, including retired Polk County Emergency Medical Services director Raymond Chatlos and Frostproof interim city manager T. R. Croley, spoke on Norris' behalf.

Norris was found guilty of two counts of vehicular homicide and two counts of DUI manslaughter, although during his trial, his attorney John Liguori contended that Norris was not driving the pickup. Norris and Mitchell Venable, 20, and Ricky Russ, 21, were all ejected from the truck. Venable and Russ died at the scene, and Norris was hospitalized in critical condition. Norris' blood alcohol was 0.115, above the legal limit of 0.08.

I ask Daniel Norris his family, friends and supporters look at it through this “Drunk Driving Cause” perspective. It is primarily not his fault. So stand up and fight. He has nothing to loose but his DUI Shekels.

Did the Judge know it is primarily because of drinking those high alcohol content drinks called “Standard Alcohol Drinks”, which made Norris blood alcohol count to shoot up to 0.115 ! All of which have been licensed by the alcohol authorities but they go unpunished in this entire drunk driving accident matter?

Read the following most important blog posts among the others in this blog site.
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Why Driving With High BAC Is Offence - While Licensing of High-Alcohol Drinks Not?

We All know that driving having the Blood Alcohol Count (BAC) over a given (0.08) level is considered as drunk driving, DUI or DWI offence whether it had caused accidents or not!

It is solidly based on the alcohol epidemiological research surveys, which clearly points out that people having the BAC above the given levels and driving significantly increase their risk of getting into the accidents endangering their and the others life.-- the higher the drivers BAC the more the risk. It becomes highest when the BAC reaches around and above the 0.2 levels!

On the other hand the epidemiological survey also points out that the risk of the accident having the BAC levels below the given .08 level significantly less therefore it cannot be considered as an offence.

However when it comes to the alcohol drinks the authorities who license those alcohol drinks for the public consumption seem to operate strangely under a very different notion! It is mainly due to their institutional preposterous stand or position that basically asserts that all alcohol drinks irrespective of the alcohol content (percentage) in them high or low some how equally cause alcohol(ism) problems including the drunk driving and its accidents!

However truth of this matter is same as it has found in the drunk driving BAC surveys --also in the field of alcohol drinks ; ‘all the alcohol epidemiological research surveys basically points out that almost all those drunk driving incidents and most importantly those high BAC driving accidents mainly happens as a result of people consuming those HIGH ALCOHOL CONTENT beverages (that includes the standard “beer” having around 5% alcohol). Nevertheless all of which have been licensed by the authorities in the named of “Standard alcohol Drinks” (SADs*).

On the other hand same like in the BAC driving cases, there are no fundamental alcohol research survey evidences or statistics that fundamentally suggests that the consumption of Low Alcohol Drinks (LADs) having alcohol around 2% or less, results or causes any of these drunk driving offences specially its high BAC driving accidents!

However the alcohol authorities who license these alcohol drinks to public consumption seems to argue that the overwhelming majority of people who consume this high alcohol content SADs drinks, do not fall into such alcohol(ism) problem most importantly the drunk driving and its accidents. Therefore they do no wrong or offence by their licensing of the so called high alcohol drink.

Now in the court let the person charged with drunken driving stand up (or the defending lawyer) and argue that he has been driving having around that much amount of alcohol so many times so far causing no such driving accidents. It is only a small minority having above that BAC cause accidents but the majority not. Therefore it should not be made as an offence. It is only when people cause accident should be considered as a serious offence irrespective of the Alcohol Counts in their blood high or low!

Without any further deliberations let me conclude this by asking the same top question once again: Why the peoples driving With High-BAC is an Offence -- While the authorities Licensing of the high-alcohol drinks is not? -- As both of them equally as well cause driving accidents. And the latter causes far worse alcohol(ism) problems.

Related main blog posts
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html


Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell.

Karl Solid Faces Six Years Prison For Drunk Driving

September 27, 2007. The Associated press news.

Under the new law that makes the fifth DUI conviction in ten years a felony.

44-year-old Karl Solid is convicted in King County Superior Court he faces six years in prison.

Prosecutors say he has eight drunken-driving related convictions going back to 1991. When he was arrested again Saturday night he had a blood alcohol level of .28.

Solid is jailed on $250,000 bail, awaiting arraignment on October third.


Read my next blog post titled “Why Driving With High BAC Is Offence – While Licensing of High-Alcohol Drinks Not?”
Before which read my following important blog posts:


http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/paris-hilton-drunk-driving-have.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Vivica Pleads Not Guilty To DUI Charges

Actress Vivica A. Fox has pleaded not guilty to the drunk driving, DUI, DWI charges on Thursday in a California court.

If you look at it from my “Drunk Driving Causes” perspective she could be basically right!

She was arrested March 20 by the California Highway Patrol, suspicion of driving under the influence

If convicted, Fox could spend up to six months in jail and pay a $1,000 fine.

Anyone interested, read my following important blog posts:


http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/paris-hilton-drunk-driving-have.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Ex-Mary Washington President Guilty of Second DUI

Associated Press: Friday, September 21, 2007;
FAIRFAX, Va. (AP) -- Former University of Mary Washington president William J. Frawley 54, was convicted today on another drunken-driving charge -- this time in Fairfax County.

A Fairfax County judge suspended a 30-day jail sentence, fined him $300 and suspended Frawley's license for a year -- all on condition that Frawley remain on good behavior for a year. The judge also sentenced Frawley to substance-abuse counseling.

I see it as such a tragedy that this Drunk Driving conviction to happen to a 54 year old man! Together with the court sentencing it made him to loose this most important job at this age among other thing and the DWI stigma on his entire life.

But what makes me to feel extremely sorry for him is the way that he takes the entire blame of his drunk driving on himself, pleads guilty and like everybody else and become the latest gullible victim of the alcohol industry and the authorities fraudulent deed or the misconduct!

I suggest William Frawley to visit most importantly my following web pages (and the other posts as well)so he might get some basic about the causes of drunk driving, which are hidden from the public view. Hope it would provide him and his families a deep inside into this matter so help to fight it out.

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell.

Kiefer Sutherland DUI: His Fault Or Not!

Kiefer Sutherland 40, arrested mainly on drunk driving, DUI charges -- on early Tuesday, September 25, 2007.

Here I have basically a different point of view from the conventional one - on this entire drunk driving issue.

In a inteview last year Sutherland told Rolling Stone magazine that he struggled with alcohol, and had previously been arrested for driving under the influence.

“It’s been the biggest problem for me. I have a few drinks and I'm not so worried about tomorrow and not thinking about yesterday. I am in this moment and I don't give a s*** about anything else. It's right out of the textbook on problem drinkers,” he said.

It is what I mainly point out as the vulnerability or gullibility of people to those high alcohol content drinks. The consuption of which inadvertantly makes them to slips and fall into such a intoxicated, durnk, impaired state than they really have intended! --Especially when they were in such a need to drive inorder to reach their destination.

It my opinion it is the alcohol authorities who licence those potentially dangerous high-alcohol content drinks(that includes the standard “beer” having around 5% alcohol) in the name of Standar Alcohol Drinks (SADs) for the public consumption, primarily responsible for causing all those drunk driving problems in people including in this famous actor.

If the authorities licenced only those safe low-alcohol drinks (around 2% or less alcohol content) for the public consumption, most probably this great actor never would have fallen into this drunk driving incident.

To know more about the alcohol authorities “misconduct” on this subject matter visit most importantly my following web pages, (and the other posts as well) so he might get some basic facts about the causes of drunk driving, which are hidden from the public view.

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/paris-hilton-drunk-driving-have.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html


Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Alcohol Control Chief Faces DUI Charge

Chris Lilly the executive director of the state's Alcoholic Beverage Control booked under a drunken driving charge after he was arrested during a traffic stop.

Police said Lilly smelled of alcohol, lost his balance during a sobriety test and recorded a Breathalyzer reading of 0.181. The legal limit is 0.08.

Lilly posted $1,000 bail early Sunday, and was scheduled to appear in court on Oct. 18, Jessamine County Jailer Cecil Moss said.

Gov. Ernie Fletcher appointed Lilly to the executive director position last year. Before that, Lilly was the commissioner of the state's Department of Public Protection and executive director for the Office Of Charitable Gaming.

It is a irony people make the alcohol control laws themselves inadvertently get caught into it.
I suggest Chris Lilly to visit most importantly my following web pages, (and the other posts as well) so he might get some basic facts about the causes of drunk driving, which are hidden from the public view. -- Hope it would provide him and his families a deep inside into this matter so help to fight it out.

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell.

Hamilton Women Plead Not Guilty of DUI

Gathered from WCPO.COM News Report on 25th Sep. 2007.

On Sept 9th Sarah Welsh from Hamilton drove drunk the wrong way on 1-75, hitting another vehicle head-on.

Jean Marie Smith, of Aurora, Indiana died at the scene.

Gary Henderson, a father of three, suffered critical injuries and is still in the hospital. His family worries that he may lose his leg due to the serious injury and infection.

Welsh, a mother of three and a nurse at Mercy Fairfield Hospital, pleaded not guilty.
The judge set the bond at $200,000.

I suggest Sarah Welsh and to her lawyers or any one interested, to visit most importantly my following web pages so she might get some basic facts about the causes of drunk driving, which are hidden from the public view. It may help her in defense of her not guilty plea.

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell.

Drunk Drive DUI DWI: Authorities Misleading

Every drunk drive, DUI, DWI, especially when people get caught into its vicious cycle of devastations and the tragic deaths.—It makes me feel extremely sad, helpless and tormented---due to my knowing about its hidden facts.--- Any one follow me or not but I repeatedly write about it! Trying to uncover those facts --- that I hope will help some-one some-day to stand up snd fight against those alcohol authorities who are primarily responsible for the all those peoples DUI, DWI, specially its tragic accidents, and its fatal consequences.

It all begins with the alcohol authorities misleading or fraudulent position about the alcohol drinks. It basically asserts that ‘all alcohol drinks irrespective of the alcohol content in them high or low somehow equally cause alcohol(ism) problems’.

However all those alcohol epidemiological research surveys fundamentally points out that almost all of those alcohol(ism) problems results from peoples consumption of the high-alcohol drinks named as Standard Alcohol Drinks (SADs) that includes the standard “beer” having around 5% alcohol. On the other hand there are no fundamental evidence that people who take to consume the Low-alcohol (around 2% or less) content Drinks fall into any of this alcohol(ism) problems.

Therefore the alcohol authorities fundamental stand that assert all alcohol drinks causing alcohol(ism) is basically a fraudulent (research falsification misconduct) position. It treacherously allows the potentially dangerous high alcohol content drinks for the public consumption under the title name of Standard Alcohol Drinks that causes almost all those alcohol(ism) especially among those alcohol vulnerable, gullible people.

Finally, it is very important to know that it is the alcohol industry which makes the highest profit out of all this. I have explained it in my previous paper posted in the blog titled: ”Alcohol Prohibition Mission Failure” in the Standard Alcohol Drinks Blog post series and various other blog post that focus on this entire matter some of its webpage links given below.

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Kirsten Storms DUI: It Is Not Her Fault

E-online news report on Wed, 19 Sep 2007 by Josh Grossberg

Kirsten Storms 23,The General Hospital star was officially charged Tuesday with two counts of misdemeanor drunken driving resulting from her Sept. 7 arrest on a Los Angeles freeway, L.A. City Attorney's Office

She was behind the wheel of a blue Mercedes-Benz CLK500 on the San Fernando Valley's 101 highway at about 3 a.m. The officers stoped her and subsequently found the actress' blood-alcohol level at 0.13, well above the state's 0.08 legal limit.

You Really Have A Justification


To have an justification of her drunk driving, first of all Kirsten Storms should know that the drunk driving epidemiological research survey statistics reveals that almost all those drunk driving incidents and most importantly its accidents happens as a result of people who were consuming the HIGH ALCOHOL CONTENT beverages (that includes the standard “beer” having around 5% alcohol- that probably she was drinking) all of which has been licensed by the authorities in the named of “Standard alcohol Drinks” (SADs*). On the other hand there are no fundamental research evidences or statistics that fundamentally suggests that the consumption of LOW Alcohol Drinks (LADs) having alcohol around 2% or less results or causes in any of these drunk driving offences specially its accidents!

On this basis now Kirsten Storms can argue that it is primarily due to this irresponsibility or misconduct of the authorities licensing such extremely dangerous or “unsafe” SADs for the public consumption that caused her and all the others drunk driving. If the authorities licensed only those safe low alcohol content beverages for the public consumption such a drunk driving incident of her would not have happened!

The authorities may argue; if you consider that SADs contain high alcohol thus dangerous or unsafe for you then why did you choose to drink it? It is your own CHOICE! No one forced you to drink it or prevented you from opting for the LADs if you presume they are safe!

It may seem the authorities giving a fitting answer. However if one looks little deeper into this matter they can find the insensitiveness, irresponsibility or misconduct of the authorities on this issue. I have explained this matter in my document “Alcohol Drinking: Is It A Matter of Choice?” also in many of my other blog post the weblink of some of them given at the end of this post.

Now let me show why it is not that possible for Kirsten Storms to make a choice of drinking the LADs in this social situation specially given her celebrity stature! Because most importantly the celebrities have to face more public pressure, impressions, compulsions. Kirsten Storms is a super model and she should carry this image! She should remain above the ordinary people in all her preferences house, cars, dresses, sex, fancies, food drink and the pleasures whatever! She can not prefer some thing which is considered not powerful or bold enough that would weaken her famous public image!

Therefore she simply can not prefer those cheap, low alcohol drinks, which are consider to be having low pleasures points even if she had known it is considerably safe having a very low risk and considerably very safe, while people all around her enjoying their high pleasure, high risk high alcohol content drinks. It will make her inferior, a failure or looser in her carrier that she cannot afford!

However the situation would have been different if the authorities only licensed the considerably safe low alcohol drink for the public consumption. Then she would have not had any such compulsions to choose those high alcohol content drinks when they are not at all made available. Not to mention those millions people who also would not had such a drunk driving incidents and most importantly its tragic accidents! So the drinkers drunk driving is primarily authorities fault!

However Kirsten Storms may never will know this truth!

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-driving-deaths-facts-hidden-from.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Father Drunk Driving and Daughter get Killed

Wales.co.uk Sep. 17, 2007 News: Darryl Shaw, 42, of Borth, Aberystwyth, west Wales, was jailed on 17th Sep. 2007 for two years for causing death of his 10 years old daughter Georgina in a drink-drive tragedy.

Michelle Elmore, 30, his partner and the girl’s mother equally drunk also sentenced to 12 monts prison suspendend for 18 months during which she will be under supervision

Tragedy struck when a drunken Shaw sped off home in his Peugeot 405 last November with Elmore by his side and Georgina in the back, Swansea Crown Court heard today.

Within minutes the car careered off the B4353 at Borth, hitting two parked cars and demolishing a telegraph pole and a lamppost.

Shaw sustained a minor back injury, Elmore was unharmed, but Georgina received serious head injuries, which later proved fatal.

The couple had moved from Warwickshire in February 2006 to start a new life in west Wales. The couple had run a cafe together in Borth which had proved unsuccessful.

Elaine Nixon, for Elmore described her as “crying a lot and thinking about her daughter. She is in a very low mood and she cannot face the world.

“A result of the stress of losing her own daughter is that she rarely leaves home. That is in the day.

“At night she dreams about it. She blames herself for what happened that night and she will have to deal with that for the rest of her life.”

Passing sentence judge Morton said: “You both will have to live with what you have done for the rest of your lives.”

It is the Authorities who are Responsible

Every time when I read about the drunken driving tragic accident especially when people maimed, killed makes me extremely hurt --- due to my knowing about its hidden facts that I mention below.

Most of these fatalities involves the drunk driver having more than twice or thrice BAC level over the safe limit for driving.

It mainly happens because of the drinks having the high alcohol content which the authorities call as the Standard Alcohol Drinks (SADs) and license it for the public consumption.

It potentially cause all these excessive alcohol consumption, intoxication or the drunkenness, which lead into various alcohol(ism) problems!

Many people after getting drunk drive in a need to reach destination and tragically fall into its fatal accidents which fatally maims kills people.

It is the alcohol authorities who license these extremely dangerous high alcohols content drinks (SADs) for the people’s consumption are primarily responsible for the drunk driving especially for its tragic accidents, fatal maiming and the killings.

Read my earlier blog post Titled: Drunk Driving: Facts Hidden From View.

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell

Drunk Driving Deaths: Facts Hidden From View

The tragic accidents fatal deaths of drunk driving many (if not most) times its victims turns out to be--if not the drunk drivers themselves-- then they are co-passengers, traveling in that fateful vehicle. They are closely related to the drivers, sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, close relatives, friends, and colleges -- rather than someone out side this circle the public!

Whatever may be the case whoever may be the victims, the drunk drivers are instantly described as the killers! Killers of their own daughters, sons, close relates friend colleagues-- monster killers of the public in the media.

The drunk drivers never would do or did such a thing intentionally. They had never thought human life would be lost as the direct result of their drunk driving even in their remotest dreams. Many of them would have preferred themselves to be dead instead of others becoming victims in this accident.

Of course this after remorse may sound meaningless to the dead victims, to their families. The drunk drivers treated as not trustworthy! Whatever may be the case, nevertheless the total blame of the drunk driving accidents its deaths put upon the drunk drivers --The Anti drunk drive campaigner, prosecutors argue it is entirely the drunk drivers fault he/she did it intentionally! Having the full knowledge that the drunk driving is extremely dangerous that it kills people!

However nobody seems to care what makes people that much drunk in the first place! The real culprits of the drunk driving are actually those alcohol drinks! Of course after much coxing the authorities may agree that all those alcohol drinks play a role in causing these alcohol(ism) drunk driving problems. Nevertheless they are not ready to put any of the blame on it because according to them alcohol is a product of nature, which is not its fault! Neither of those manufacturers who produce and market it or of those alcohol authorities who ultimately license it for the public consumption!

The authorities further contend that the alcohol drinks only for those who are able to use them safely! The seriously warn people that it is not meant for those alcohol vulnerable people -- they should not drink it at all There exists no alcohol drinks which is considered to be safe for them! Therefore if such people take to the drink and fall into those alcohol(ism) problems then it is their own fault and they should face all its consequences! This basically shows the authorities utter disregarded, negligence or the failure to maintain the safety of the vulnerable drinkers and to safeguard the public interest. Let me show it in the following example.

There was a recent incident of Chinese dolls that is been in the market for quite some time for the children’s play! They are coated with the paint, which contains extremely high levels of lead much above than the amount considered to be safe. If any children put this toys in their mouth, it will be fatal to their health. --Now that toy makers argued that it is only for those children above the age, mature enough who usually don’t put it into their mouth on the other hand it should not be given to those vulnerable small children. Now you know what happened next and hope I need not go further into that entire story.

Similar to those toy makers the alcohol manufacturers together with the alcohol authorities argue that the alcohol vulnerable immature people should not consume those alcohol drinks at all. If ever they use or misuse it (and act like those small children!) and endanger others life then they should be severely punished to make an example that would act like a deterrent to other as a preventative measures! The alcohol drinker may not be the children but the alcohol makes people to behave like small children more or less you know!

The crux of the matter is; all these alcohol(ism) problems including the drunk driving primarily happens because of a ongoing “Alcohol Research Misconduct”, which in turn allow all those alcohol authorities to license those high alcohol content drinks in the name of Standard Alcohol Drinks.-- I have explained about it in details in so many of my blog post papers in the fast. Now at the end of this post I am giving some of its most important webpage links.

I totally agree that drunk driving and its accidents causes tragic deaths and devastations on hundred of people life. I feel extremely sorry for those innocent victims and their families. However they mostly may not agree with my position on this mater and not ready to give up their official authorities position that entirely puts the drunk driving blame on the drivers.

Anyhow I contend that drunk drivers are the most misunderstood tragic victims of the drunk driving who suffers the most and battered from all directions. First they become the offenders as well as the victims of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) thereafter the authorities subject them to their falsified Drunk Driving Indoctrination and keep them brainwashed bundled into its shackles.

Hereby I call upon all those misunderstood, misinformed and tormented drunk drivers to come out of the authorities Influence of the falsified drunk driving indoctrination and to fight back. You have nothing to loose but your SHACKLES!

http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-research-misconduct.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/07/standard-alcohol-drinks-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/gov-alcohol-policy.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/08/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice_15.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-side-of-drunk-driving_14.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/09/drunk-drivers-fight-back.html

Vallab (Valerian Texeira)
Alcoholics Curewell