LADs Success In DUI Prevention: Is A Premature Question

When I contend High-Alcohol Drinks (HADs) cause almost all alcohol drunk driving DUI accidents, perhaps a question preemptively crop up in many peoples mind; ‘how can any one be so sure that on the other hand the Low-Alcohol Drinks(LADs) do not cause any such DUI problems’? What is the guaranty after all that taking all the difficult decisions, measures of banning all the HADs and licensing only the LADs for public consumption would succeed (at least substantially) in removing all those drunk driving accidents? ---To put it in other words; ‘where is the concrete research evidence that proves that the alcohol vulnerable, gullible people in order to prevent the alcohol(ism) DUI problems consuming only the LADs would not loose control (like it happens with their SADs) and consume excessive alcohol consumption that will make their BAC to shoot up to two, three times over the DUI limit and fall into the same tragic alcohol(ism)problems. Most dread full of all is the drunk driving fatal accidents’!

My answer to it is; first of all it is a premature question! Because my actual contention in this matter is; there are overwhelming alcohol epidemiological research evidences that points out that almost all the drunk driving accidents are caused by the high-alcohol drinks (most popular is the standard beer containing around 5% alcohol content in the drink) on the other hand there are absolutely no evidences to prove that the low-alcohol drinks (which contains 2% or less alcohol content in the drink) causing any of the drunk driving accidents!

Despite these above overwhelming research facts, the alcohol authorities (promulgations) basically assert that all alcohol drinks cause alcohol(ism) problems irrespective of the alcohol drink in them high or low. On this basis they continue to license all those HADs, which basically causes all those alcohol(ism) problems and the most dreadful of them is the Drunk Driving fatal accidents. All this I basically allege could be the outcome of the alcohol authorities above mentioned misdeed or the “misconduct”!

Hope I have cleared the misconception or the premature question on my contention about these HADs and the LADs. On this basis I strongly urge all the people and the authorities concerned to urgently look into this matter of Standard Alcohol Drinks Policy before they take any decision and steps on licensing or banning any of those drinks.

I have explained this matter more in so many of my previous blog post in this month and the last month citing many of the DUI news reports. And most importantly read the following most important papers in my blog WebPages:
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/10/alcohol-research-misconduct-cause-drunk.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/10/standard-alcohol-drinks-sads-cause.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/10/standard-alcohol-drinks-sads-licensing.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/10/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/10/alcoholics-should-ask-compensation.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/10/drunk-driving-dui-facts-hidden-from.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/10/drunk-drivers-have-chance-to-fight-back.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/10/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/10/drunk-drivers-alcohol-vulnerable.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/10/why-driving-with-high-bac-is-wrong.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/11/alcohol-bosses-real-culprits-of-drunk.html

Vallab
Alcoholics Curewell.