Add to Technorati Favorites

Thursday, January 24, 2008

LADs Success In DUI Prevention: Is A Premature Question

Please Note: - This article has been revised, updated and put forward newly in this post.

When I contend High-Alcohol Drinks (HADs) generally containing around and above 5% alcohol cause almost all alcohol drunk driving DUI accidents, perhaps a question preemptively jump up in many peoples mind; ‘how can any one be so sure that on the other hand the Low-Alcohol Drinks(LADs) containing around and below 2% alcohol do not cause any of those DUI problems’? What is the guaranty after all that taking all the difficult decisions, steps, measures of banning all the HADs and licensing only the LADs for public consumption would prevent all those drunk driving/accident problems?

To put it in other words; ‘where is the concrete research evidence that proves that the alcohol vulnerable, gullible people would not fall into any of the alcohol(ism) DUI problems by consuming the LADs instead of the HADs?


My answer to it is; first of all it is a very early or premature question! Although there are no concrete research reports which clearly shows that the LADs do not cause any alcohol(ism) problems but at the same time neither there are research evidence on its contrary! On the other hand the alcohol epidemiological research, surveys on this matter basically points to the fact that almost all the alcohol(ism) problems including the drunk driving/accidents caused by the high-alcohol drinks, licensed and marketed under the named of 'Standard Alcohol Drinks'. Most popular among is the standard beer containing around 5% alcohol content in the drink.

Hope I have made clear about my contention regarding HADs and the LADs, the main difference between the two based on my study on the alcohol research. On this ground I strongly urge all the people and the authorities concerned, to urgently look into this critical matter of Standard Alcohol Drinks Policy before they take any decision of licensing and marketing those high-alcohol content standard drinks.

I have explained this matter in more details in so many of my previous blog post in this month and in the previous month. Most important of all read the following papers in this blog WebPages:


http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2008/01/alcoholics-curewell-in-essence.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2008/01/alcohol-research-misconductcause-drunk.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2008/01/alcohol-prohibition-mission-failure.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2008/01/standard-alcohol-drinks-authorities.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2008/01/alcohol-drinking-is-it-matter-of-choice.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2008/01/alcohol-bosses-real-culprits-behind.html
http://alcohol-research-misconduct.blogspot.com/2008/01/why-driving-with-high-bac-is-wrong.html

Valerian Texeira
Alcoholics Curewell

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home